CrowdStrike cuts 500 jobs in AI pivot, but flags risks

CrowdStrike cuts 500 jobs in AI pivot, but flags risks

Cybersecurity giant CrowdStrike is cutting 500 jobs, or 5% of its nearly 10,000-strong workforce, as it pivots to an AI-driven operating model to chase “greater efficiencies” and a “$10 billion annual recurring revenue (ARR) target.”

CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz framed AI as a “force multiplier” intended to “flatten our hiring curve” and streamline operations, according to a letter to employees included in a regulatory filing.

The company anticipates layoff-related charges between $36 million and $53 million through mid-2026, though it plans to continue hiring in customer-facing and engineering roles. It also stated this restructuring is part of an “evolving operating model” necessary to navigate a “market and technology inflection point,” citing AI’s potential to “accelerate execution and efficiency” across various functions. Kurtz also highlighted “multi-billion-dollar market opportunities” in areas like NG-SIEM, cloud, and identity security.

Analysts and market trends suggest additional factors, such as economic uncertainties, including potential trade policy shifts and fluctuating global demand, are likely in play.  However, this AI-centric pivot is shadowed by the company’s own disclosures as the SEC filings acknowledge significant risks associated with AI, including “hallucinatory” outputs, potential legal challenges, and the difficulty of fully controlling rapidly evolving technology. 

AI as strategy, and risk

While the company touted AI as a growth driver, the filings also warned of risks from flawed models to undetectable errors. Sofia Ali, principal analyst at QKS Group, described CrowdStrike’s AI-first approach as a “double-edged sword.” She noted that while it offers efficiency gains, “unbridled automation could undermine trust if it leads to a breach or false positive cascade.”

Ali added that the sustainability of such a strategy will hinge on three factors: transparent AI validation pipelines, strong human-in-the-loop processes, and a governance framework. Without this balance, she cautioned, security leaders relying on the platform could face heightened risks from undetected threats or compromised support.

Ali also warned that workforce reductions, particularly when they extend to critical areas like R&D, engineering, or customer support, can signal more than just efficiency goals. Such cuts might indicate underlying challenges like product stagnation, misaligned market strategies, or adjustments driven by market commoditization pressures.

CrowdStrike’s layoffs reflect a broader tech industry pivot toward automation. In early 2025, tech firms like Salesforce, Workday, Duolingo, and Shopify slashed jobs to double down on AI. According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, 40% of employers expect to reduce staff for tasks that can be automated with AI. In just the first few months of 2025, over 52,000 tech jobs have been cut, as per Layoffs.fyi.

A CISO’s new mandate

As security vendors trim traditional roles and lean more heavily on AI, will support, integration, and incident response suffer? Ali warned CISOs to “review vendor roadmaps for signs of over-prioritizing AI.”

She cautioned that replacing essential human expertise — such as threat researchers or customer success teams — with automated systems like large language models (LLMs) could potentially diminish the long-term resilience and reliability of the security platform itself.

AI-driven innovation is crucial, but must be balanced with human expertise, Ali warned.  “If vendor talent in key areas like threat research, complex integrations, or hands-on incident support is significantly eroded in favor of automation, organizations might experience gaps in coverage or diminished service quality, particularly during high-stakes security events,” added Ali.

For companies like CrowdStrike, the path to $10B ARR also rests on proving it can scale a leaner model without eroding the trust. Do the gains in speed and scale delivered by AI come at an unacceptable cost to the trust, stability, and human expertise? This trade-off, especially in a field built on confidence and trust, is one that CISOs and security leaders must now examine closely, noted Ali.

​The original article found on CISA warns of cyberattacks targeting the US oil and gas infrastructure | CSO Online Read More